Question about the thesis.
Refer to this
article
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/science_and_pseudoscience_in_adult_nutrition_research_and_practice/
In
recent years, nutrition research and practice have lagged behind many other biological
and medical fields. In part, this lag is due to many pseudoscientific beliefs and
practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific methods.” The controlling is
that nutrition research is not being studied as much as biological and medical fields
because the ideas fail to have a scientific
foundation.
Based on this argument can you provide 5
supporting arguments that supports the thesis
No comments:
Post a Comment