For the most part, critics today see Beckett's work as a
masterpiece. Most have come to see it as a landmark of theatre, a work whose thematic
importance is only matched by its artistic. This was not always the viewpoint when it
first opened. European audiences saw much relevancy in Beckett's work. There was
general acclaim for the work and what it sought to represent. At the same time, many in
Europe were able to debate the thematic implications of the work in realms such as
religion, ethics, and philosophy. When the work came to America, reception was not as
intensely positive. The work struggled to find a niche with people wondering "if a
joke" had been perpetrated. American audiences had a tough time with Beckett's work,
its staging, and the end thematic ideas. Interestingly enough, the production at San
Quentin prison earned a great deal of acclaim. It seemed that while the general
American public had a difficult time understanding the work, those incarcerated at San
Quentin understood what the play was saying about waiting and
hope.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
What do critics say about Waiting for Godot ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What accomplishments did Bill Clinton have as president?
Of course, Bill Clinton's presidency will be most clearly remembered for the fact that he was only the second president ever...
-
To determine the arithmetic mean of the elements of the set Z, we'll have to determine what are the elements of ...
-
You might like to analyse the humour in this short excerpt. There is a sense in which, as in all of his fiction, Twain uses hype...
-
In their narratives, authors use various methods of characterization: through a physical description through a phys...
No comments:
Post a Comment