I don't think that there is any implication on Sophocles'
part. I think it's rather direct in that the battle between fate and free will is not a
contest. Fate always wins out. Sophocles creates a very compelling portrait of free
will. Oedipus is not a bad man nor is he a bad king. He cares for his people,
represents a man of action, provides for his family, and is concerned with his well
being. In this setup, free will is shown to represent strong aspects of one's being in
the world. Yet, despite his benevolent actions that have been generated by free will,
he is unable to escape his destiny. His free will is so compelling that Oedipus does
not even know that he is kiling his father and marrying his mother. He acts in concert
with sincerity that he does not even fully grasp the totality of his actions. Yet, his
fate does. His fate understands where he will go even before he does, which is why fate
is presented as a dominant force in the drama. Sophocles argues that our role as human
beings is to merely understand this condition. Struggle as we might, as Oedipus did, to
go against it or to use our free will to defeat it, such a condition is the only
certainty in this life and to understand it becomes part of our own state of being in
the world, as Oedipus was forced to do at the end of the drama.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
What's Sophocles' view towards fate or destiny as implied in Oedipus Rex?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What accomplishments did Bill Clinton have as president?
Of course, Bill Clinton's presidency will be most clearly remembered for the fact that he was only the second president ever...
-
To determine the arithmetic mean of the elements of the set Z, we'll have to determine what are the elements of ...
-
You might like to analyse the humour in this short excerpt. There is a sense in which, as in all of his fiction, Twain uses hype...
-
In their narratives, authors use various methods of characterization: through a physical description through a phys...
No comments:
Post a Comment